Cloudbusters Causing Climate Breakdown

Cloudbusters  Are  Now  In  Second  Place  As  A  Cause  Of  Climate  Breakdown  And  Atmospheric  Destabilization.  Most  Of  The  Deterioration  In  Climate   Stability  That  Is  Conventionally  Being  Ascribed  To  Greenhouse  Gases  Is  In  Fact  Being  Caused  By  Backyard  Hobbyists  Playing  With  Cloudbusters.


1. Water vapor is around 100 times as efficient as a greenhouse gas as CO2 is, and there is at least 100 times as much of it in the atmoasphere, so the net greenhouse effect from water vapor is at least 10,000 times as great as that of CO2. And since the normal variation in the amount of water vapor is more than 15% from any one year to another, any contribution from CO2 would be lost in the background and undetectable.

2. Plants take up CO2 and in sealed greenhouses, with extra CO2 pumped in, they grow bigger and faster. If there were actually more  CO2 in the air today than there was 50 years ago, any old farmer or gardener would tell you his plants are growing bigger now than they did 50 years ago. Since there has been no noticeable increase in plant growth, there has been no increase in CO2,  no matter what the scientists may claim their instruments measure.

3. Moose in New England are moving south. In colonial times, they were found as far south as central New Jersey, but starting in the 1840s, at the end of the Little Ice Age, when the climate became warmer than it had been for the last 400 years, they moved north and when I was growing up in New England, they were found only in Maine and the far north of Vermont and New Hampshire. Now, for the last 30 years, they have been moving south and are now permanent residents in Mass. and have been seen as far south as New Jersey.

The reason is that there is a small fly that gets into their ears and drives them crazy. They stay to the north of its' range. When the climate warmed up in the 1840s, the fly expanded north and the moose moved north to stay away from it. So if the moose are moving south again, that fly is contracting its' range southward, and they are now again able to follow it south.

So the climate, at least during the part of the year in which these flies breed, is getting COLDER, not warmer. And I simply do not care how many scientists say otherwise or what their reasons for saying it might be. They are wrong. And if all the so-called "scientists" on earth say one thing and the moose tell me the opposite, I will trust the moose, not modern science.

The whole issue of climate destabilization has been so politicized that nothing reported in the scientific journals can be trusted. And there is no scientific consensus, no matter what the claims are to the contrary. But even if there was a consensus, science is not a democracy and the question of who is right cannot ever be settled by a vote. It can only be settled by citing the EVDENCE, not by citing the numbers of scientists who believe it. It is entirely possible for 100% of all scientists to be dead wrong on some issue. That has happened many times.

Any scientist who thinks the climate is gettting warmer is simply going according to a theory and ignoring the evidence. The greenhouse gases theory is wrong, but it happens to be the only theory they know of, so they go with it in spite of evidence to the contrary.

Most climate scientists today do not even look at any evidence outside their offices. What they look at are computer print-outs. They do almost all their work with computer models, not observations of the natural world outside their windows. And a computer model is only as good as the assumptions they put into it.

They see changes happening in climate. That is true. And they see that the changes match the growth in numbers and industrial activity of humans. That is also true. And they see the match in time as evidence that there is a cause and effect relationship between climate changes and human activities. That is also true.

 But then they make a typical mistake that is very common in science. They do not know any way to explain how human actions could be causing the climate changes except the greenhouse gases theory, so they conclude that it must be greenhouses gases that are causing the climate changes.

They are wrong. The bulk of the climate collapse is being caused by oranur effects. Oranur is caused by radioactivity. It is caused by electromagnetic technology. It is augmented by deforestation and daming rivers and ploughing and paving and over-grazing, all of which interfere with the natural re-processing of the DOR which is the long-term residue of oranur back into healthy, motile living energy. In short, there is an orgonomic explanation for the observed climate collapse that does not depend on the CO2-acting-as-greenhouse-gas theory.

The climate is changing. But it is not getting warmer. It is also not getting colder. What it is doing is getting warmer and colder. It is getting wetter and drier. In short, it is getting more random. It is getting more variable. It is getting more chaotic and fluctuating more widely. It is going to extremes. It is pulsating more rapidly and with greater amplitude.

On a statistical graph, this will look as if things are normal because a very hot summer and a very cold winter average out to a normal year. A very warm winter and a cool summer will also average out to a normal year. So to a scientist, with the usual mechanistic fixation on numbers, there will have been a normal year, while to any living organism, there will have been two disasters instead of one.

Most of of what is being attributed to global warming and blamed on greenhouse effect from extra CO2 in the air is really due to oranur, and its' after-effect, DOR. Most of that is from the use of radioactivity, both civilian and military. The rest is from electrical technology and bad land use practices like deforestation. If there is a component from industral pollution, it is a very small one, probably less than that from forest fires.

The direct biological effects of radioactivity have been intensively studied, and are well-known, even if not as well understood. But the meteorological effects have not been studied by anyone except Reichians and one physicist I spoke to once in Lithuania, whose work has not been published in English, and he told me he has not been able to get funding to do more research on the subject since 1988.

The second most important contribution to climate breakdown, after oranur, is cloudbusting. A single cloudbuster has a range of hundreds, sometimes thousands, of kilometers. In fact, the long-range effects can sometimes be global in extent. And there are now hundreds, possibly even thousands, of cloudbusters around.

 Cloudbusters are the second most important form of atmospheric pollution after oranur. They are the second most important reason for climate destabilization. And they are growing in numbers at so rapid a rate that they could even surpass the nuclear industry in the near future in terms of the damage done to the environment, at least as far as direct meteorological damage, though probably not yet in terms of long-term biological damage. And so far, nobody except the few people on this list is even aware of the problem.

And while there is an hysterical world-wide politicized movement of unscientific global warming pushers promoting the false claim that a greenhouse effect from combustion-produced gases is causing climate changes, nobody except the people who read this are going to do anything about the cloudbuster problem that is the real cause of much of the climate destabilization.

We are working on founding a registered NGO to address cloudbuster proliferation as an environmental issue. We have gotten far enough along in the process that a plan of action is starting to take shape, but implementing it will require a few more people than those who have expressed an interest so far.

We have found out what we will need to do to incorporate as a tax-exempt organization, and we have written a lot of material that will go on our website. One of the people working on this project is experienced at website design, and another is a member of a group that can provide us with free website hosting, so as soon as we can get all the  material to post ready to go, we will have a website.

Then we can apply for NGO status and start asking for donations and applying for grants. We plan to do a lot of lobbying, conferences with government officials to try to convince them to prosecute cases of improper cloudbusting, filing lawsuits, and in some case, we expect to make citizens' arrests of illegal operators if we cannot get the authorities to act.

We will also be educating the pùblic about the importance of free and independent weather, without human intervention, as a prerequisite for a healthy biosphere. We plan to have a regular newsletter, including a comic strip for children ( or ex-children ), featuring a little, live whirlwind, who will give illustrated talks on how the weather works and why it is important to leave it alone to do its' job.

And we will have on-line correspondence courses and seminars to teach people how to detect cloudbusting operations in their areas and what they can do about it. We also plan to set up local chapters in each country, to investigate cases of suspected cloudbusting in their regions and work with local authorities to hold illegal operators accountable.

We will work toward a set of standards in the field, and a Code Of Practice for cloudbuster operators comparable to that of the medical profession. We will demand transparency and accountability as a pre-requisite for conducting cloudbuster operations.

If you are interested in joining us and helping us get the organization formed and registered, please speak up and volunteer.

Joel Carlinsky
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )
joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

Cirrus clouds and the DOR Ceiling

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:11 AM

From:

"joel carlinsky" <joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com>

To:

"Orgonomic Ecology" <OrgonomicEcology@yahoogroups.co.uk>

Cirrus cloud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the last few decades, actually beginning in 1945, at the start of the Atomic Age, there has been an increase in the amount and / or frequency of high-altitude thin cloud cover. Such high thin clouds now often fill the entire sky and sometimes for days at a time.

This high thin haze was described in the 1950s by Reich in his account of his trip across America to Arizona. He attributed it to the atomic bomb testing program which at that time was setting off atomic bombs in the atmosphere on a weekly basis. According to Reich, the  atmospheric energy continuum which underpins both the movement of the atmosphere and its' chemical composition, was being affected by the intense radioactivity from the bombs and the haze and stagnation was the result.

Reich found by his cloudbuster operations in Arizona that he was better able to  remove this stagnated condition when he took his cloudbuster up into the mountains, where he could  aim down at the cloud cover instead of aiming up at it from the valley floor. He was impressed enough by the advantage of elevation that when he returned to the East Coast, he consulted with an engineer from the Sikorsky helicopter company in Connecticut about the possibility of doing cloudbusting from a helicopter, but at the time, there was no helicopter capable of lifting a large enough tank of water to enable cloudbusting from the air.

After his death, during the Viet Nam war, larger helicopters were built, which could lift a tank of water weighing several tons, enough to connect a cloudbuster to. But by that time, the DOR-ceiling over most of the United States had risen too high for a helicopter to get above it. The average altitude of large area contiguous DOR over North America was around 5,000 ft ( 1524 meters ) in Reichs' time, and is now around 40,000 ft. ( 12,192 meters ), which happens to be about the usual altitude of commercial jet aircraft on long-haul flights.

The apparent cause of the increase in DOR and the increase in height and extent of the DOR ceiling, is the great amount of radioactivity from decades of nuclear bombs, nuclear reactors, re-processing of nuclear fuel rods, and other radioactive industrial processes, along with the large increase in electromagnetic equipment in use, including radar, microwave trasmissions, and high-voltage powerlines. Adding to the amount of DOR in the atmosphere are the reductions in the natural ability to re-mobilize DOR caused by deforestation, the damming of large rivers, and the denuding of large areas of the earths' surface by livestock grazing, agriculture, and urban sprawl.

The spread of DOR across the visible sky has therefore become almost contiguous, with very little natural, healthy sky still visible in many places for much of the time. This has not gone unnoticed by both meteorologists and the public. Not surprisingly, since so few people are aware of the findings of Reich and the developments that have followed in the field of orgonomy in more recent decades, there are theories that have been developed to explain the change in the amount of high thin cloud cover, and those theories are wide of the mark.

The common theory in meteorology holds that in order for a raindrop to form from water vapor in the atmosphere, there must first be a tinty particle of solid material for the vapor to condense around. This theory is called the "condensation nucleus" theory. According to it, each and every single raindrop must form around a solid particle, and if no particles are present, no raindrops can form.

It is this theory that forms the theoretical basis for the practice of "cloudseeding", which consists of releasing large amounts of tiny particles into the air, either from an aircraft or from a burrner on the ground, to provide the needed condensation nuclei for water vapor to condense on and form raindrops. Silver iodine is the prefered  particlulate matter because it is considered the best size of crystal to condense water vapor.

The main theory proposed by meteorologists to explain the increase in thin, high-altitude cloud cover is that there has been an increase in visible clouds because of the ice crystals formed by the water vapor in the contrails of jet aircraft flying at those elevations.

Cirrus cloud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are several serious problems with this theory, however. Anyone who has ever watched as a cloudbuster fills the formerly clear sky with clouds can testify that clouds can form without any particulates for them to condense around. The cloudbuster does not put out any particulates of anything.

 In fact, several meteorologists have told me that since the cloudbuster does not create any particles for water vapor to condense on, it could not possibly create clouds. In their view, I must be mistaken. I could not possibly have seen what I tell them I saw because the conensation nucleus theory requires a large number of tiny particles to be present in the air for condensation of water vapor into raindrops to take place.

So, instead of changing the theory to fit the eyewitness testimony, the "scientists" would rather refuse to accept the evidence because of their theory. Needless to say, since I was there and I know what I saw, and they were not there, and did not see it, I consider them, not I, to be mistaken.

But there is reason even for one unaware of cloudbusting to disbelieve the condensation nucleus theory. If you fly a small aircraft through a cloud, the windscreen will get wet. Fly out the other side of the cloud, and the water will soon evaporate, leaving it clean, not streaked with dust as it would be if the cloud was full of dust particles.

Hold a glass microscope slide in a rain, catch raindrops on it, and place the slide under the microscope. Do you see any tiny particles in the center of each raindrop? I did this and found no particles in most raindrops. So I am skeptical of the theory that every raindrop must have condensed around a particle of solid material in the atmosphere.

So for several good reasons, I consider the condensation nucleus theory to be wrong and the alternative, orgonomic, theory, that rain is formed by the merger of energy streams in the atmosphere, to be proven by the frequent observation that altering the energetic parameters of the atmospghere will cause clouds and rain to form.

And from that it follows that the theory of high-altitude thin cloud cover being formed by condensation on ice crystals from jet aircraft contrails is also wrong. What is being seen in the sky and taken for clouds of water condensing on ice crystals is really nothing of the kind. It is what Reich refered to as the "DOR ceilling".

 And it is a haze, a stagnation of the atmospheric energy that can look "glaring" and "white" at a distance and under strong lighting conditions. It is caused by the dying of the planetary energy field due to continual assault by technologies that expose it to intense secondary energies, nuclear and electromagnetic, along with the reduction in the capacity of the earth to absorb and recover from such assaults.

It is therefore ironic that some people are refering to these high, thin sheets of DOR, which appear to be clouds, as "man-made clouds", which is certainly correct, but meaning it in a very different way. They are not thinking these clouds are caused by DOR, or that man is indeed creating them by his nuclear and electrical industries, augmented by his devastation of the natural recovery systems of the earth through bad land use practices. They are instead thinking these clouds are "man made" because they are being formed by the contrails from high-flying aircraft.

And, according to one of my correspondents, there have been some cases of people who have no idea what they are doing, thinking the DOR cover they see is created by aircraft contrails, are trying to disipate it with woefully inadequate home-made toy versions of the cloudbuster.

 In their ignorance, they are making a bad situation worse by using poorly designed, poorly grounded equipment that will excite the atmosphere into an even greater state of chronic expansion, leading to intensifying and prolonging any drought tendencies that already exist in their areas.

A properly done, fully-funded cloudbusting program on a global scale could still reverse the decline in the atmospheric energy field and keep this planet habitable for a time, perhaps even long enough to bring the Atomic Age to an end. But poorly designed home-built equipment in the hands of hobbyists pointing it at the sky at random, without any co-operation between them and without any basic understanding of the energetic functioning of the atmosphere will only make things worse.

And they are bad enough already without any more cloudbuster-game players playing their silly games with the atmosphere.

You may recall that a few months ago I made a suggestion on this list that we form a registered NGO to work on cloudbusters as an environmental issue. Well, a few of the list members volunteered to help, and we have been having a lot of correspondence about it ever since.

We have found out what we will need to do to incorporate as a tax-exempt organization, and we have written a lot of material that will go on our website. One of the people working on it is experienced at website design, and another is a member of a group that can provide us with free website hosting, so as soon as we can get all the  material to post ready to go, we will have a website.

Then we can apply for NGO status and start asking for donations. We plan to do a lot of lobbying, conferences with government officials to try to convince them to prosecute cases of improper cloudbusting, filing lawsuits, and in some case, we expect to make citizens' arrests of operators if we cannot get the authorities to act.

We will also be educating the pùblic about the importance of free and independent weather, without human intervention, as a prerequisite for a healthy biosphere. We plan to have a regular newsletter, including a comic strip for children ( or ex-children ), featuring a little, live whirlwind, who will give illustrated talks on how the weather works and why it is important to leave it alone to do its' job.

And we will have on-line correspondence courses and seminars to teach people how to detect cloudbusting operations in their areas and what they can do about it. We also plan to set up local chapters in each country, to investigate cases of suspected cloudbusting in their regions.

If you are interested in joining us when we get the organization registered, please let me know. Didn't you ever want to grow up to be a detective?

COVERT CLOUDBUSTING PLANNED IN GERMANY?

On his recent lecture and seminar trip to Munich, Germany, Dr. James DeMeo charged only 10 Euros for the lecture, and 60 for the one-day seminar. That raises an interesting question.

In the past, he has usually charged $200 ( 152 Euros ) for a two-day seminar, and cancelled if fewer than 10 people signed up, stating that that would not be enough to pay his travel expenses for the trip. Since a plane ticket would cost the same no matter how much time he spent on the seminar, one would expect he needs at least $2,000 ( 1500 Euros ) to pay for a trip to Europe.

At 60 Euros per person, he would need around 30 people attending to pay for the trip, and that is rather big and unwieldy for a seminar. Also, it is more than most of his seminars have attracted in the past, so it is unlikely he expected enough attendees to pay for this trip to Germany.

So, how was this trip paid for? Was there some other reason for the visit to Germany? And was the single lecture and one-day seminar only an after-thought? But if that was the case, why did he not say on his mailing list what the true reason for the trip was?

There is only one reason I can think of for secrecy: That he was actually going to Germany to hold a private, non-public, seminar or consultation with somebody, and that, not the public lecture and seminar, was what paid the expenses of the visit to Germany.

And of all the possible topics for which Dr. DeMeo could expect to be asked to teach or consult, the only one for which there could be any desire for secrecy would be cloudbusting.

So, pending further disclosures by Dr. DeMeo or someone who is in a position to know, I tentatively conclude that he paid a visit to Germany to conduct a private seminar or consultation with some individual or group who plans to engage in cloudbusting and were willing to pay for his advice.

And the reason they did not want to make any public disclosure of that intention is that DeMeo is feeling the heat from my criticisms of his incompetence in previous cloudbusting operations and does not want to risk drawing any more critical attention.

And in view of his past track record in the cloudbusting field, that is probably a wise decision on his part. .

 It is very likely that a group based in Munich and acting on advice from Dr. James DeMeo will attempt cloudbusting in Southern Germany in the next few months.

If you live in that part of Europe, please watch the skies and look for signs of cloudbuster-generated interference with the weather. 

 And if you detect anything suspicious, please send me an e-mail about it.

This Is The Planet Of The Worms

This Is The Planet Of The Worms---And We Had Better Realize How Important They Are

Invention is the mother of necessity. For every invention, there is an equal and opposite problem created. The impression one is taught in school, of a steady line of inventions being added to the list, each one a solution to a problem that existed previously and was solved by that invention, is a false one. The facts are that every invention has both advantages and drawbacks, and usually, the advantages are seen and the drawbacks ignored untill it is too late to avoid them.

A good example is the horsecollar. It came into common use in Europe in the late Middle Ages, long after oxen were used to plow fields, which started in early antiquity. An ox can pull a plough with a rope around its' neck, but a horse would choke if that was tried. The invention of a way to shift the weight from the neck to the shoulders of a horse meant it could be used to pull a plough. And since a horse is much faster than an ox, that meant a much larger area of land could be cultivated in a day by the same number of workers.

So food production boomed. And large areas of forest were cleared for farming. And the population of Europe boomed. And the cycle repeated itself, with ever-more people and ever more land being cleared to feed them. So most of the land of Europe was cleared. And there were extinctions of most of the large animals of Europe. And the larger population caused crowded conditions that led to plagues that killed many of the people.

And there were wars fought that would never have been fought in the days when the population was much smaller. And there were expeditions to other continents to size control of resources. So there was slavery and colonization and genocide. And much of the bloody history of the past several centuries was written because of the horsecollar.

Now, there is another invention being claimed to be a boon for food production. The cloudbuster. It is being said that with this invention, it will be possible to bring the deserts of the world under cultivation. The people promoting this idea say this will make possible the feeding of the ever-growing population of those poor countries. And they say this would be a good thing for the people of those countries.

There are some reasons to question their assumptions, however. They could start by looking at what types of farming the increased water in the desert would make possible.

Because it would certainly not be organic farming or farming of traditional crops by traditional methods. The addition of water to desert sand does not always mean fertile soil. The sand, with water added, still needs a lot of organic material mixed in with it to be able to support more than the hardy pioneer species that recolonize areas that have been devastated by something like a forest fire, cultivation, or desert conditions that may have lasted for centuries. The less hardy species will have to wait until the soil has been prepared for them by the pioneer plants that can grow under less benevolent conditions.

 The real tillers of the soil are the earthworms, which form a majority of the biomass of this planet, and whose ceaseless activity is the basis of all plant growth on earth. Unless the worm population is big enough, the newly irrigated desert land will remain a useless waste of hardy crabgrass-like species, unable to develop further until recolonization by worms has taken place.

How long would that take? It depends on the size of the area that must be recolonized. In the case of the Sahara, an area about the size of the continental United States, it could take several centuries from the time there was sufficient rainfall to support climax  vegetation until there was a soil that could fully contribute to that growth. Worms would have to slowly spread from around the edges to the interior of the newly moist area until they met in the center. Then, after there was an initial worm mass in the soil, it would still take many years until the worm population had increased enough to render the soil ferrtile enough to be able to support a climax vegetation.

But since humans cannot be expected to wait that long, they would have to add artificial fertilizers to the soil instead. And those fertilizers would have to be made in factories from oil. And they are expensive. So the project would have to be large enough for the loans it would need to be made available. 

And the cost of the loans and fertilizers would have to be paid in money earned from export of food grown on the formerly desert land. And since that would require loans from international banks and investments by overseas investors, those investors and banks would be the owners of the project. And that would mean the benefits of the project for the local population would end up being a lot less than the promoters think they would be.

The cloudbuster is not a quick fix for all problems. As long as the present social and economic system is in place, no matter who does what with a cloudbuster, the same people who now own the world will own whatever benefits result. And the same people who do not own the world at present will still have to pay for anything that goes wrong.

And if history is any guide, something will.

Cloudbusting, Farming, And Population

Many of the people who decide to try cloudbusting are farmers or if not farmers themselves, they cite "helping farmers" and "producing more food" as one of their main reasons for cloudbusting. But so far, to the best of my information, not one of them has ever been active in any effort to reduce demand for food by reducing the population, something that could reduce the need they think exists for interfering with the functioning of the atmosphere to grow more food.

Several vegans have suggested there would be less land needed to grow grain if people gave up eating meat. The reasoning seems to be that since cattle are fed grain, and eat more than humans would, the grain saved by not feeding them could be eaten by humans.

That thinking overlooks the fact that it is only in the United States, with 5% of the world population, and a few other first-world countries, mainly in Northern Europe, all with small populations, that cattle are fed on grain. In most of the world, cattle are raised only on grass, and the land used to graze them is marginal land not good for growing crops, which is why it is used for grazing.

So if that land was no longer used for grazing, other land, now in a more or less natural state, not in use, would have to be cleared to grow the extra crops that would be needed to feed the people that portion of their diet that now comes from grass via cattle. This is shown in Brazil, where a lot of rain forest has been cleared to grow soybeans to export to Europe and America to be eaten by people who have been convinced to take up a vegan diet.

It can also be seen in Southeast Asia, where large tracts of rain forest have been cleared to grow palms to provide vegetable oil for export to Europe and North America for vegetatrians and vegans to use in cooking. So, instead of killing cows, these well-meaning but uninformed people are indirectly killing elephants and orangutans by depriving them of their habitat.

One recent correspondent sent me an article that claims the earth could grow enough food for twice the current population on the same amount of land by improved farming methods.

I replied:

"An interesting article. But it has a number of flaws. It does not even touch on the immense damage done to the natural plant life by modern methods of farming, such as genetic modification of plants used for crops. Animal life also is harmed by modern farming methods like that, as in the case of bees needed to pollenate plants being killed by GM plants they feed from, and lab rats being rendered sterile by eating GM foods.

Growing more crops is not the answer. It is only the answer Monsanto and other  purveyors of agricultural chemicals and GM seeds want to sell as the answer.

 If only safe and ecologically sound farming methods were used, only a small fraction of what is grown today could be grown. It is true that modern cattle raising is a very harmfull practice, but if the best replacement for it is to grow more crops with modern agricultural methods, that could be even worse.

To really do any good, it is not enough to replace one evil with another, and posibly worse one. We need to solve the root problem, too many people on this planet, not just switch them from one form of destruction to another by changing their diets. The problem is not what these people eat. It is that there are too many of them that are eating anything.

And feeding them with imports from Mars would not solve the problem either because the total human ecological footprint on the earth is far, far greater than just what  is done to provide food. If there were more people, there would be more demand for electricity, fuel oil, highways, forest products, more urban sprawl, more pollution, more rivers damed, more nuclear reactors built, and a long list of other demands on the earth, "

I am still awaiting a reply.

Now, if someone is really concerned about how well people eat, and also about protecting the environment, I would expect that person to already, before even ever having heard of cloudbusting, to be active in the movement to reduce population, and in combating the evil, criminally insane religions that oppose doing anything to solve the population problem.

 If someone who has never tried to work on that issue says he wants to intervene in the functioning of the atmosphere to "help farmers" or "prevent famine", he is probably guilty of self-deception and I would suspect him of being more interested in power-tripping and the emotional satisfaction and feeling of power from being in control of the weather than in helping anyone. After all, if he has never tried to help solve a problem until he hears of cloudbusting, why should he suddenly want to solve it with a cloudbuster when he never was too concerned about it before?

Cloudbusting can and should be used to restore normal atmospheric functioning in cases where the atmosphere is not functioning naturally and needs help to recover. But cloudbusting is not a solution to the problem of too many people all wanting to eat and too much land being needed to feed tham all.

The cloudbuster is not a way to add the deserts of the world to the farms of the world. In places where deserts are the result of human activity, such as deforestation or over-grazing of livestock, simply increasing rainfall would not help much. The rain would soon stop again if the reason the landscape became a desert in the first place was human use, unless it was allowed to regain its' original vegetation cover and remain undisturbed as a natural ecosystem and not be ploughed up and cultivated as soon as possible. .

Cloudbuster-aided recovery of lands that have been deserts for ages due to some ancient catastrophe, could be done eventually, but it would take many years, possibly even centuries after the return of full atmosphericpulsation and normal weather, for the ecosystems of those lands to fully recover. Creating rain in a desert area without first removing the DOR barriers that obstruct approching weather fronts, and then ploughing the newly irrigated land, would be adding additional vandalism to the damage already done by desertification, and would delay recovery of the ecosystem by many more years if an attempt at real recovery was ever made at some later date.

Altering normal or seasonal weather in an ecosystem that is functioning well already, but not suitable for commercially valued crops, would be a willful destruction of a properly functioning ecosystem merely to change it into farmlands, useless for anything except growing food for an ever-growing human population that can never be satisfied.

So cloudbusting should not be thought of as a panacea to enable unrestrained population growth by irrigating deserts to turn them into farms. The cloudbuster is not just another method of irrigation. It is not a farm tool.

Properly speaking, the cloudbuster is a form of medical treatment, on a landscape scale. And it should be used in the spirit of a medical treatment, for the health of the patient, the earth. It is the only means by which an injured and dying ecosystem can be restored to health. And that is its' only legitimate purpose.

Underground Radio And Underground Cloudbusting

When I was a teenager, a kid in the neighborhood who was heavily into electronics, and who incidentally is now an electronics engineer for a local TV station, set up a full-scale radio broadcasting studio in his basement, using a home-made transmitter and a technique called "carrier current", capable of sending the signals over the city power transmission lines so it was impossible for the FCC to trace where the signal was coming from except as far as the nearest power line.

For that whole summer we broadcast programs that could be picked up on a regular AM radio all over town on a regular schedule while the FCC tried fruitlessly to find out who we were. We ran up what would have been a $2.5,000,000 fine if we had ever been caught, and only quit when we had to go back to school in the fall. We called ourselves, "Your Underground Radio Station. Which was appropriate since we were located in a basement.

Now, except for political revolutionary groups and resistence movements in occupied countries during wartime, I have never heard of any other illegal radio station with regularly scheduled programing. Most people just naturally take it for granted that a radio station must have a license to broadcast. Hardly anyone questions that. It is regarded as a fact of nature. And the need for a license is not just a matter of a government wantinmg to control and tax something. It really IS based on a fact of nature.

There is a limit to the amount of room available in the portion of the spectrum that can be used for broadcasting, so there must be a means to prevent too many stations from crowding the spectrum and interfering with each other. Requiring a license to operate and allowing only one license-holder to use each usable frequency is the only possible way to have any useable broadcasting at all.

Of course it was not always so. In the early days of radio, for the first few years after radio was invented, anyone was free to build and operate a broadcasting station at will with no regulation at all. But that changed in a few years when the spectrum began to get too crowded for that, and laws were passed to allocate parts of the spectrum to licensed operators so they would not block out each others' signals. Otherwise, since the radio spectrum is a resource of limited extent, the resulting chaos would render all radio impossible.

Cloudbusting is still in the stage of a free-for-all, with no controling agency to allocate cloudbusting priviliages to qualified operators and ensure that their operations are in the public interest. The difference is that radio was regulated within a few short years of its' inception, while cloudbusting has now been around for 60 years.

 It is reasonable to ask why this is so. Why has no body of laws been enacted to prevent the rather obvious harm to the public that unlicensed cloudbusting can cause?

Other new technologies, such as the airplane and the automobile, were licensed and regulated within a few years of their invention also. Most new technologies and inventions rather quickly are subjected to control by the authorities. Cloudbusting, like firearms, which existed for centuries before anyone thought to regulate them, seems to be among the very few exceptions.

That is going to have to change. And it is going to have to change soon. Already, countless lives have been lost due to the ignorance of inexperienced cloudbuster operators.

 In one single cloudbusting project in East Africa, more than 20,000 people died from diseases carried by large numbers of insects that bred in the puddles of standing water left all over the landscape in the wake of out-of-season rains brought by a "successful" cloudbusting operation to "green the desert" in a nearby country. If the same amount of rain had fallen at the right time of year, there would have been no such epidemic because migratory birds would have been there to eat the insects, but at the time of year when the birds were not there, epidemics resulted.

A short telephone consultation with an ecologist would have alerted the cloudbuster operator to the dangers, but I know of no instance of any cloudbuster operator ever bothering to consult an ecologist. And this despite there already being several laws on the books, in almost all countries, that would require such consultations for any project that could reasonably be expected to impact the environment.

At the present time, anyone, anywhere in the world, who feels like taking up cloudbusting can do so without regard for any environmental protection laws or the safety of the public. Although there are laws in several places that clearly require anyone intending to engage in weather modification to obtain a permit,  nobody has ever done so. And nobody has ever been prosecuted for disregarding these laws.

But a teen-ager caught using a home-made radio transmitter to broadcast home-made programing to people who want to listen to it would be subject to a huge fine, more than his expected lifetime earnings.

Just as there is a limited amount of broadcast band available to use for radio broadcasting, and a too-crowded spectrum would cause interference that would render all broadcasts useless, so there is a limit to the number of cloudbusters that can be used in a given area without interfering with each other and ruining the results. The effective range of a typical cloudbuster operation is up to several hundred kilometers, and long-range side-effects have been noted at much greater distances than that.

 Regulation will have to take into account the great range of cloudbuster operations and prevent compound or conflicting operations from accidentally disrupting, augmenting, or counter-acting  each other. That would require, among other things, that all proposed operations be made public in advance, probably on a specially dedicated website that anyone could access to see if any cloudbusting is planned for today, and if so, where it is being done and what the proposed operation is intended to accomplish.

In a very large country, such as the United States, Canada, Russia, China, or Australia, there might be room for several cloudbusters to operate without too much risk of overlaping effects. But in other places, such as Central Europe or the Balkans, there might be no room for more than one cloudbuster to serve several countries.

Co-ordinated operations by several cloudbusters working together might also be done. This would involve a much greater area, and therefore the co-operation of several governments unless an international regulatory body is formed. Again, the experience gained by the international agreements that regulate international activities such as aviation, shipping, and radio broadcasting will point the way to international co-operation in the field.

Any effective regulation will require some means of detecting covert operations. A cloudbuster is too cheap and too simple to build for the safety of the public to depend on nobody happening to attempt an illegal operation. An investigation agency of some sort will be needed to track down cases of suspected cloudbusting and gather evidence needed to successfully prosecute the case.

Unlike radio broadcasting, an operating cloudbuster does not put out any signal that can be detected and traced. But the behavior of the atmosphere is sometimes a clue to if there has been a cloudbuster at work or not. From watching the weather maps it is often possible to note anomolies that indicate cloudbusting. The methods of observation and deduction that have been pioneered by a few workers in the field can be developed into a new branch of orgonomic science: Forensic Orgonomy, the art and science of detecting cloudbusters at work.

Cloudbusting cannot be simply lost and forgotten. It is vital to the entire future of life on this planet. The advent of the Nuclear Age has rendered the cloudbuster essential to our survival. It MUST be used, not abandoned. But it must be used responsibly, and only by people who understand both the science behind it and the biological environment upon which the cloudbuster exercises its' effects.

Given that condition, the cloudbuster is among the greatest benefits ever to happen to this planet. And without that condition being met, it is among the very worst dangers threatening the earth.

Now It's Official

USGS Proof That Fracking Causes Earthquakes

"Earth's crust is pervasively fractured at depth by faults. These faults can sustain high stresses without slipping because natural "tectonic" stress and the weight of the overlying rock pushes the opposing fault blocks together, increasing the frictional resistance to fault slip. The injected water counteracts the frictional forces on faults and, in effect, "pries them apart", thereby facilitating earthquake slip."

In 1994, there was a big earthquake in California. 

1994 Northridge earthquake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The earthquake happened after an all-night drawing operation with  a cloudbuster by a group calling itself the C.OR.E. Network, headed by Dr. James DeMeo. The cloudbuster, one of several mounted on trucks for mobility, and traveling all up and down the West Coast, had been grounded into a well which connected to the underground water table. 

A cloudbuster draws orgone energy from the point in the sky it is aimed at into the water it is grounded into. And orgone energy in high concentrations, makes water expand. The water was already under high pressure and the expansion shattered the billions of tiny cells in the porous rock. Resulting slipage and vibrations are what triggered the earthquake. 

Now, this conclusion by the U.S. Geological Survey concludes that is possible, just as I have said all along. This strongly supports my analysis of the event and adds substancial weight to the possibility that Dr. DeMeo and his associates are guilty of :

"The death toll came to a total of 57 people, and there were over 8,700 injured. In addition, the earthquake caused an estimated $20 billion in damage, making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history."